Condorcet's Principle and the Preference Reversal Paradox

نویسنده

  • Dominik Peters
چکیده

We prove that every Condorcet-consistent voting rule can be manipulated by a voter who completely reverses their preference ranking, assuming that there are at least 4 alternatives. This corrects an error and improves a result of [Sanver, M. R., & Zwicker, W. S. (2009). One-way monotonicity as a form of strategy-proofness. Int J Game Theory 38(4), 553-574.] For the case of precisely 4 alternatives, we exactly characterise the number of voters for which this impossibility result can be proven. We also show analogues of our result for irresolute voting rules. We then leverage our result to state a strong form of the Gibbard–Satterthwaite Theorem.

برای دانلود رایگان متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

The likelihood of the Borda effect in small decision-making committees

Simple plurality voting allows the surprising possibility that a majority of a committee or an electorate may prefer one of the defeated alternatives to the plurality winner. Relatively little attention has been devoted to this paradox (which is distinct from Condorcet's 'paradox of voting') sincc the 18th century. \Vith seven-person committees choosing among three alternatives, the theoretical...

متن کامل

The Unimportance of the Scitovsky Reversal Paradox and Its Irrelevance for Cost-benefit Analysis

The possibility of preference reversals using cost-benefit analysis has concerned economists since the early 1940s, when Scitovsky (1941) published his results. Lawyers and philosophers have used this possibility to attempt to discredit cost-benefit analysis. Scitovsky reversals will not occur when one position is first best, when there is no crossing of the production possibility curves, when ...

متن کامل

Upside-Down Preference Reversal: How to Override Ceteris-Paribus Preferences?

Specific preference statements may reverse general preference statements, thus constituting a change of attitude in particular situations. We define a semantics of preference reversal by relaxing the popular ceteris-paribus principle. We characterize preference reversal as default reasoning and we link it to prioritized Pareto-optimization, which permits a natural computation of preferred solut...

متن کامل

Preference reversal in quantum decision theory

We consider the psychological effect of preference reversal and show that it finds a natural explanation in the frame of quantum decision theory. When people choose between lotteries with non-negative payoffs, they prefer a more certain lottery because of uncertainty aversion. But when people evaluate lottery prices, e.g., for selling to others the right to play them, they do this more rational...

متن کامل

Decisions with Errors

This paper presents a new theory of decision making with errors. The proposed theory explains all major violations of expected utility theory such as the preference reversal phenomenon (including the strong reversals and the preference reversals with the probability equivalents), the common consequence effect (the Allais paradox), the common ratio effect, the violations of the betweenness axiom...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

عنوان ژورنال:

دوره   شماره 

صفحات  -

تاریخ انتشار 2017